| Subcribe via RSS

Hockey Stick: the first climate change metaphor

August 20th, 2008 | 3 Comments | 252 views |

temperature reconstruction, 10 studies

In his Public Understanding of Science 2000 article ‘Knowledge, Ignorance and Popular Culture’, University of Toronto Professor Sheldon Ungar suggests the reason that public understanding and concern could coalesce around the ozone hole, where it has failed to do so for climate change, was in part due to two things: first, that the ozone hole argument found bridging metaphors from popular culture that were easily understood; and second, it engendered a ‘hot crisis’.

As Ungar suggests, these bridging metaphors for the ozone hole were simple and powerful:

The signal advantage of the ozone hole is that is can be encapsulated in a simple and widely familiar “penetration” metaphor. Stated succinctly, the hole leads to increased bombardment of the earth by lethal rays. The idea of rays penetrating a damaged ’shield’ meshes nicely with abiding and resonant cultural motifs, including Hollywood ‘affinities’, ranging from the Starship Enterprise to Star Wars.

Importantly, as Ungar notes, these metaphors are ‘pre-scientific’. That is, they’re kept simple, before they get into the scientific detail of the ways in which ‘ozone eater’ chemicals destroy the earth’s atmospheric protection.

In fact, these metaphors were so powerful, that both Ungar (2000) and Hargreaves, Lewis and Speers (2003) found that many people simply considered climate change to be a sub-set problem of/caused by the ozone hole problem. In a saturated media, people hold onto the main themes and frameworks of science stories, and not much more, with which to take educated guesses at what’s going on in the world (Hargreaves et al, 2003). More »

Tags: , , , , , , ,

‘I can’t believe The Sun’s gone so far…’

June 10th, 2008 | No Comments | 26 views |

Yesterday I looked at the 40% decline in coverage of climate change in the UK national press between May 2007 and May 2008 due, most probably, to coverage of the credit crunch. While that was disappointing, today I’m taking a closer look at some of the specific coverage of climate change in May 2008, starting with the The Sun, and its Arctic blog.Arctic, under creative commons licence

Launched on April 22nd and running through to May 12th, The Sun newspaper’s Arctic blog heralded the step change for tabloid coverage of the environment that has happened in the last couple of years. From publishing just six headline stories from Oct 2000 to Nov 2006 directly about climate change, according to research conducted by Neil Gavin at the University of Liverpool, The Sun (and News of the World) published more headline stories in the first five months of this year, mainly in its Go Green section. In May this year alone, climate change or global warming received 44 mentions.

Benn’s ok, but not everyone is happy
And many of these mentions have accepted climate change is real, happening, and that we need to change behaviours. In fact, the Sun’s done so well, it’s congratulating itself (not a surprise there) quoting Environment Minister Hilary Benn for ‘leading the charge’ on climate change.

It hasn’t come without some fallout. Of the 26 comments on the article announcing the launch, over 95% were hostile to the idea of climate change, one even going so far as to claim:

I cant believe a paper like the Sun has been taken in so readily by the Global Warming Enthusiasts.

Although it may not seem far to go for many, The Sun’s coverage is, I feel, a bit of a landmark for the 3.15m people who bought a copy every day in May 2008. So what were they reading?

More »

Tags: , , , , , , ,
View blog reactions