BBC impartiality and climate change

Tony at Harmless Sky has been following , for 18 months at least, development of BBC policy on the coverage of climate change.
He picks up on this line from a rather obscurely-titled BBC report on impartiality:
The BBC has held a high-level seminar with some of the best scientific experts, and has come to the view that the weight of evidence no longer justifies equal space being given to the opponents of the consensus [on anthropogenic climate change]. From Seesaw to Wagon Wheel, Page 40
As Gareth in the comments points out, the seminar was one of the Real World seminars the BBC holds each year, where execs from the corporation get together to debate particular issues. In 2006, it was focused on climate change. This line from the report worried Tony enough to send the BBC a request under the Freedom of Information Act, and I agree that the response from the BBC is far from satisfying. One reason perhaps is that the Real World workshop quoted was held under Chatham House Rules, so the BBC are stuck in being unable to release information about who attended the seminar.
Tony’s post has been picked up by some other bloggers, one of whom I’ve had debate with recently, who take this as proof that the BBC is proselytising the ‘climate alarmism’ cause (again, on alarmism, see my post on James Risbey’s work). There is a ‘fabulously interesting and in-depth’ post on the Hockey Stick Graph debate over at As with Bishop Hill’s views on the BBC’s position on climate change, I’m not so sure…. More »
Tags: BBC, climate change, impartiality

